|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
An Argument for Routine Ultrasound Screening of the Thoracic Aorta in the Cardiac Surgery Population
William S. Whitley*
and
Kathryn E. Glas
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: wswhitl{at}emory.edu.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Stroke and neurological injury are among the most devastating and disabling complications associated with cardiac surgery. Transesophageal echocardiography and epiaortic ultrasound allow for sensitive, point-of-care diagnosis of thoracic aortic disease, which is especially common in patients with heart disease. Unlike other operative procedures, the manipulation of the ascending aorta is routine in cardiac surgery and often unavoidable. Dislodgement and embolization from the ascending and aortic arch atheromas have been clearly associated with manipulation during cardiac surgery. Epiaortic ultrasound and transesophageal echocardiography screening are more accurate and more accessible to the operative team than any other available modality to diagnose atherosclerosis of the aorta. The goal of this review is to review the rationale and scientific evidence that suggests that the routine use of ultrasound guidance in cardiac surgery may improve postoperative outcomes in this patient population.
First published on November 19, 2008, doi:10.1177/1089253208328583
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 2008;12:290.
A more recent version of this article appeared on December 1, 2008

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Swaminathan
Thinking From Inside the Box
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia,
December 1, 2008;
12(4):
225 - 227.
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|