SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Afifi, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Afifi, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Lung Protective Ventilation Strategies

Sherif Afifi, MD, FCCM

Yale University School of Medicine, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, and Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, IL

While traditional ventilation approaches are appropriate for the patient without significant lung disease and only requiring short-term mechanical ventilatory support, the strategy should be altered for the patient with severe lung disease. Research on the mechanisms of ventilator-induced lung injury has led to the development of mechanical ventilation strategies that imrove patient outcomes. The trend toward using lower tidal volmes, limited airway pressures, and PEEP have produced imroved outcome results. Predictive indices of outcome using laboratory values, biologic markers, and mediators of lung inury are being evaluated for early identification of patients at risk for lung injury. Nonconventional ventilatory approaches, such as noninvasive positive pressure ventilation and high freuency ventilation, as well as adjunctive therapies (inhaled niric oxide and extracorporeal circulation) are being explored as alternatives in ARDS and ALI. While more clinical studies outine outcomes in specific subgroups of patients, the ventilatoy strategy should continually be revised at the bedside.

Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, Vol. 6, No. 3, 259-269 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/108925320200600308


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement