SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Granton, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Gelb, A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Granton, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Gelb, A. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Neuroprotection During Carotid Endarterectomy

Jeff T. Granton, MD

Department of Anesthesia, University of Western Ontario, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada

Adrian W. Gelb, MB ChB, DA, FRCPC

Department of Anesthesia, University of Western Ontario, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada; Department of Anesthesia, University of Western Ontario, University Campus, 339 Windermere Road, London, Ontario N6A 5A5

The goal of neuroprotection during carotid endarterectomy is a reduction in the frequency and severity of perioperative stroke. This includes cerebral ischemic events secondary to hypoperfusion during cross clamping, emboli, or both. However, rational use of protective techniques requires that patients at risk first be identified. This process begins with a thorough preoperative assessment, including neurological status and angiographic findings. lntraoperative monitoring is the next step in the identification. This can include the awake patient, electroencephalogram, transcranial Doppler, stump pressure or combinations of these. Unfortunately, evidence is lacking to demonstrate that any of these modalities is superior to another or to no monitoring at all. Finally, when a patient is at risk, a protective technique needs to be chosen. The use of surgical shunt placement has received mixed acceptance from surgeons performing these procedures. Barbiturate coma and anticoagulation may offer benefit but come with inherent risks as well. Maintenance of a high mean arterial pressure with vasopressors and fluids may also help improve collateral flow.

Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, Vol. 6, No. 1, 21-25 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/108925320200600106


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




Advertisement