Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to browse AJSM online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Naylor, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Naylor, A. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, Vol. 4, No. 2, 110-114 (2000)
DOI: 10.1053/vc.2000.6493

Carotid Endarterectomy: Surgical Techniques, Emboli, and Outcomes

A. Ross Naylor

Department of Surgery, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, United Kingdom

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is now the single most commonly performed peripheral vascular procedure in the western world, and is one of the few surgical procedures to be evaluated in level 1 randomized trials. Yet, despite that it has a proven role in selected patients it still remains a source of continuing debate. At pres ent, there is little consensus on many of the individual aspects of the procedure, such as the role of patching, shunting, and general anesthesia. More recently, there has been an increasing interest in the role of periopera tive monitoring, largely because of increasing aware ness that most strokes follow inadvertent surgeon error. This article reviews the surgical aspects of CEA together with an overview of the evolution of a monitor ing program, which has contributed to a 60% reduction in operative risk.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?