This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Halpin, L. S. Articles by Ad, N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Halpin, L. S. Articles by Ad, N. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Heart Surgery Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Public Health Reporting: The United States Perspective

Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia, Linda.Halpin{at}Inova.org

Scott D. Barnett, PhD

Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia

Linda L. Henry, PhD

Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia

Elmer Choi, MD

Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia

Niv Ad, MD

Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia

The release of 2 landmark reports by the Institute of Medicine titled, "To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System" and "Crossing the Quality Chasm" were instrumental in the identification of safety and quality issues. Since their release, federal and state programs of public reporting of performance measures have attempted to close the quality gap of care that is inappropriate, not timely, or lacking an evidence base. Cardiac surgery has long been the focus of public scrutiny, and now, as we move from an era of managed care to public reporting, reimbursement for cardiac surgery procedures will be tied to performance. However, the question is whether public reporting and pay for performance will ultimately improve the quality of patient care, safety, and provide the consumer with enough information to make surgeon and institutional choices. Will the cost and focus of achieving perfection with performance standards overshadow any real improvement in clinical outcomes?

Key Words: outcomes • pay for performance • quality • public reporting

Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, Vol. 12, No. 3, 191-202 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1089253208323412


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. L. Higgins Metrics That Matter: Can Transparency Fix the Health Care System? Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2008; 12(3): 137 - 139. [PDF]