This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Kramer, A. A. Articles by Zimmerman, J. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kramer, A. A. Articles by Zimmerman, J. E. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Heart Surgery Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Predicting Outcomes for Cardiac Surgery Patients After Intensive Care Unit Admission

Cerner Corporation, Vienna, Virginia, akramer{at}cerner.com

Jack E. Zimmerman, MD, FCCM

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC

Most performance assessments of cardiac surgery programs use models based on preoperative risk factors. Models that were primarily developed to assess performance in general intensive care unit (ICU) populations have also been used to evaluate the quality of surgical, anesthetic, and ICU management after cardiac surgery. Although there are currently 5 models for evaluating general ICU populations, only the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) system has been independently validated for cardiac surgery patients. This review describes the evolution, rationale, and accuracy of APACHE models that are specific for cardiac surgery patients as well as for patients who have had vascular and thoracic procedures. In addition to performance comparisons based on observed and predicted mortality, APACHE provides similar comparisons of ICU and hospital lengths of stay and duration of mechanical ventilation. However, the low mortality incidence of many cardiac outcomes means that very large numbers of patients must be obtained to get good predictive models. Thus, the equations are not designed for predicting individual patients' outcome but have proven useful in performance comparisons and for quality improvement initiatives.

Key Words: intensive care unit • outcome • acute physiology and chronic health evaluation • predictive models

Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, Vol. 12, No. 3, 175-183 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1089253208323413


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. L. Higgins Metrics That Matter: Can Transparency Fix the Health Care System? Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2008; 12(3): 137 - 139. [PDF]