Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for free access to the SAGE eReference platform!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by London, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by London, M. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, Vol. 10, No. 1, 17-23 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/108925320601000105

Beta-Blockade in the Perioperative Period: Where Do We Stand After All the Trials?

Martin J. London, MD

University of California, San Francisco; Department of Anesthesia, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, CA londonm{at}anesthesia.ucsf.edu

Perioperative myocardial infarction following noncardiac surgery is a complex process with a variety of proposed etiologic factors. Perioperativeb-blockade has been reported to reduce perioperative myocardial infarction and cardiac death, with possible direct effects on longer-term outcome, particularly after vascular surgery. Despite two high-profile studies that have pushed this topic into the mainstream of medicine, the number of patients studied and outcomes observed remains limited, especially for a therapy recommended for widespread adoption in millions of patients globally. Observational analyses, small meta-analyses, and newer randomized trial data (primarily in abstract format) suggest the therapy is of benefit in high-risk patients, whereas in patients at intermediate or low risk, it is either mildly efficacious or neutral in effect. Adverse effects appear to be limited to the expected primary hemodynamic side effects of bradycardia and hypotension, although a suggestion of increased mortality has been reported in one observational analysis in the lowest-risk group.b-Blockade may be associated with reduction in length of stay and reduced analgesic requirements, although these effects remain controversial. A single mega-trial being conducted outside of the United States with a target goal of 10,000 patients is ongoing and promises to provide definitive data within the next few years. Ongoing research into various etiologies of perioperative myocardial infarction and other medications with potential efficacy in this setting, including the important antiplatelet agents, must also be considered in developing recommendations for widespread adoption of perioperativeb-blockade.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?