Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to browse AJSM online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Westaby, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Westaby, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, Vol. 1, No. 4, 366-375 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/108925329700100409

Aprotinin Fifteen Years Later

Stephen Westaby, BSc, FRCS, MS

Oxford Heart Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, England

Aprotinin, the broad-based bovine serine protease inhibitor, was first used as an antidote against the harmful proteases released through complement-induced neutrophil activation in the early 1980s. Since then, the safety and efficacy of aprotinin have been debated. Even now, fifteen years later, aprotinin's precise mechanism of action and clear indications for use have not been defined. This article discusses what aprotinin is, its role in the contact system of blood, how it improves hemostasis, the effect of temperature on it, its use in clinical practice, and which patients should receive it. The article concludes that aprotinin's hemostatic effects are useful in patients who are at increased risk from bleeding, but that it should not be considered a substitute for surgical skill. Early claims of absolute safety were premature. Risks between high- and low-dose regimens vary significantly, and more study is required. Alternatives to aprotinin such as the less expensive antifibrinolytic agent tranexamic acid are now available, but they also require additional study.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?